Pistol Sights: Fiber Optic vs. Night Sights vs. Red Dot

Pistol Sights: Fiber Optic vs. Night Sights vs. Red Dot

Previously, I covered a general overview of pistol modifications and what my thoughts were, but now we’re going a little deeper. This one is about sights.

There are three contestants when considering sights for a pistol: fiber optic, tritium night sights, and red dot, and this is a quick, down and dirty look at what they are, what they're for, and what I actually run and recommend. I own all three. I like all three. But what's right for you depends on your context and what you're trying to do.

Fiber Optic

The knock against fiber optics is fragility, and that's what's kept most people away from them for EDC. You're not going to see them on police pistols for that reason. But I like them a lot more than I used to, and here's why: once you figure out how to properly seat the fiber optic so it's not wiggling loose, they're more durable than I gave them credit for. Mine have been in for a long time, getting knocked around, and they're not exploding apart the way I expected.

The upside is real. In any lighting condition outside, that dot just pops. You find your sight picture fast. Competitive shooters love these for good reason.

And here's the thing even if the fiber optic rod did fall out: you still have the outline of the sight frame. You can still shoot quickly and accurately off that outline. Yeah, there's a gap where the dot was—it's not ideal—but it's not a catastrophic failure either.

Where fiber optics fail is low light. That's where people immediately reach for night sights. Which brings us to the next one.

Tritium Night Sights

These are tough, durable, and they glow in pitch-black darkness from the tritium ampules inside them. Every cop in the country runs them. I like them. I can even pick them up under night vision when I'm not running a red dot. So they've got legitimate utility.

But here's the honest take: I think they're a little overrated. And before the internet explodes, I’m not saying don't get them. I'm saying think through when you'd actually use them.

The problem is this: as a good guy, you need adequate illumination to identify your target before you engage. You can't just shoot at shapes and shadows. And if you have enough light to identify a target, you almost always have enough light to see the outline of your sights. Meaning your tritium dots are rarely doing the work you bought them for.

And if it's dark enough that you genuinely need the tritium glow to find your sights, it's probably too dark to identify the threat. So you're going to need a light anyway, whether that's a weapon-mounted light or a handheld. And the moment you switch that light on, you can see your sights without needing the tritium.

It's not a deal-breaker. They're still good sights. But they're not the low-light solution people think they are when you think through the logic.

Red Dot Sights

This is where I've landed. A few years back I switched my everyday carry to a red dot sight, and I haven’t looked back. I’ve not regretted it for one single second.

The biggest argument for a red dot in an actual fight is this: under stress, you are going to be threat-focused. That's what your brain does. It locks onto the threat. Trained or not, getting to your front sight in a real, terrifying encounter is hard. The red dot lets you stay on the threat—eyes on target—and the dot appears in your vision. You don't have to shift focus planes. You see the dot on the threat, you press the trigger.

That's a huge deal in a real gunfight.

One last thing on positives before I talk about the weaknesses, for aging eyes, red dot sights are your friend, your best friend. I know, because I’m starting to get up there.

But there is a weakness; however, the good news is that you can overcome it with training. You see, without a perfect draw stroke, you will present your gun and not find the dot. And grinding reps alone isn't going to fix that if you're not getting real feedback under stress. If you're going to run a red dot, you need formal training to build the draw stroke that puts the dot in your window every time. It requires more work, not less.

You may have heard it said that red dots are the future for pistol shooting, but I’m here to tell you that the red dot is the present for pistol shooters. It's already standard for a huge swath of professionals. I made the switch and I'm not going back.

Bottom line on sights: fiber optics for competitive shooting, tritium night sights as a solid all-around option that most people will be well-served by, and red dot if you're willing to invest in the training to run it right.

Remember, Train Hard. Train Smart. And get the right sights for your pistol.

Comments (5)

Dave Dooley_

I started using tritium sights in 1980 and carried them throughout my career. I also used fiber optic sights as a USPSA competitor. Yes, I’ve seen fiber optics fall out, but if they’re installed correctly, they’ll last for years. Now I think the RDS sights are the answer for my 76-year-old eyes. The rub, as I see it, is you must have the skill to present with aligned iron sights before the RDS can be your savior. The RDS doesn’t really serve as a short cut to proficiency, but they’re a wonderful enhancement for an already skilled shooter.

Ed Pasternak _

I was going between different types of sights and designs. Then I had to get bifocals. Now it’s all red dot for me.

Art Bertolina_

what if you through lasers into the mix?

Tim Struwe _

I have all 3 but I still faster with iron sights more accurate with the red dot

Ted Demosthenes_

WPS
Recommendation:
For a good number of reasons, a follow-on article on dot color, dot size, brightness, range of use, and advanced reticle combinations would be a valuable addition to this well-written fundamental piece.
Best regards,
Ted
4089107712

Leave a Comment