Are You a Protector or a Collector?

Are You a Protector or a Collector?

I get asked all the time what I think about whatever the new hotness gun is. But honestly, my answer is usually the same thing: I don't know, I don't care, find a good tool and stick with it.

Let me explain what I mean.

A Husky hammer looks nice but it’s a little rough around the edges. On the other hand, a Pittsburgh 16-ounce claw hammer with a fiberglass handle has superior ergonomics, feel, and craftsmanship. I mean, you could really drive a nail with that thing. But at the end of the day, both of them drive nails. They're tools. They're evaluated on one thing: how well they do the job.

That's how I think about guns.

Collectors vs. Protectors

There are two kinds of gun people. Collectors and protectors.

Collectors are out there collecting. They love the new features, they get excited about every new release, they've got a safe full of different platforms, and they're doing show-and-tell. There is not a single thing wrong with that. Guns are awesome, and tons of history can be felt holding an M1 Garand, a Henry 1860, or a M16A4. Way to go, America! Collect away! That's a legitimate pursuit!

It’s just not my main driver.

What I'm focused on is being a more effective protector and defender. And those two goals can and usually do lead to very different decisions about what you buy.

Choose a Tool, Not a Trend

When I think about a tool, I want a few things: reliability, a proven track record, and an ecosystem. That last one is what most people don't think about until it bites them later on.

Often guys buy some new gun, love the feel of it, love the look of it, and then immediately hit a wall. Where do I get a holster? Can't find one. Add a light? Now you definitely can't find a holster. Try to upgrade something? Parts are scarce and expensive. All because they chose a platform that doesn't have the infrastructure built around it.

You should have gone Glock. There I said it.

Or at the very least a Glock-based platform.

Now, I know what some of you are thinking. "I don't want a Glock just because everyone else has a Glock." And here's what I'd say to that: the fact that you're avoiding Glock specifically because everyone else runs one means you're denying the global credibility from countless military special operations, law enforcement, and countless civilians who have defended their lives with a Glock.

So seriously. Glock. It comes in at a good price point, has phenomenal reliability, and accessories are always built for Glock before anything else. Its simple design and manual of arms has earned its reputation. If I were leaving Glock tomorrow, I'd probably go with something based on Glock, and honestly, that’s what we did with our War Poet collaboration with Shadow Systems. It takes Glock magazines (which is my biggest requirement because I’ve got hundreds of them), and it fits Glock holsters (which is my second biggest requirement).

System Commonality Matters

Because here's the thing nobody talks about when they're chasing the new hotness: system commonality.

I don't want 12 different guns that each come with two magazines. I'd rather have a pile of magazines that work in all of my guns. I want the same caliber, same magazines, same holsters, same spare parts, same upgrades, and everything speaking the same language.

Also, the same grip angle matters more than people realize. It means the exact same presentation every time. Same draw. The mechanics are burned in, and they're consistent whether I'm dry firing, on the range, or under pressure.

My wife runs the same platform. So, we share everything: ammo, holsters, mags, accessories. If she picks up one of my guns in a bad situation, there's no fumbling, and no learning curve.

And it goes further than that. My airsoft guns fit my holsters. My blue guns fit my holsters. My UTM force-on-force stuff…you guessed it, fit my holsters. I just got a video simulator, and the compatible firearm system fits right into my Glock holsters while having the same grip angle, so every presentation I take in it transfers directly to what I'd run in the real world.

Every rep counts. Every rep should be the same rep. That's what platform commonality does for you.

Go Deep, Not Wide

So, the next time some new gun drops and everyone's talking about it, my question is the same: why not Glock? And more broadly, why not the thing that already works, that already has everything built around it, and that your whole system is already trained to?

You want to be a better shooter. You want to be a more capable protector. That doesn't come from buying more guns. It comes from buying the right tool, and then going deep on it. After that is achieved and you have the extra income and financial responsibility, knock yourself out collecting guns. I’ve got some cool stuff in my collection, but only because I first addressed the critical protector need.

So, find a good tool, stick with it, and build your defense system around it. Invest what you'd spend on the next gun into training instead.

Remember, Train Hard. Train Smart. And before you go buy something else, ask yourself whether you’ve met the objective protector requirements before you start collecting.

Comments (17)

West_

Concur with post, but Walther, SIG,FN, in addition to or instead of Glock are excellent proven alternatives as well. As far as shadow systems are concerned, had two, traded them both, cheap poser Glocks, multiple reliability and functional issues. You want a Glock get a Glock, not a shadow system copy.

Mark_
All Salient points. Me, I want to love a Glock, any Glock, I really do. So many people, including trainers for the Warrior Poet classes I attended, have suggested Glock as the end all be all firearm. I have tried various Glocks in various ways including shooting some as rentals at gun ranges. Every time I have held one they have felt awful in my hand. The mag release is awkward, the grip angle just feels wrong, and the thickness of it makes me wish Glock pistols were not such gluttons at the dinner table. After so many attempts at tolerating, let alone liking, any Glock I have come to the conclusion that spending $1 on a Glock would be wasted money for me despite their high quality. If the only firearm made was a Glock then I would buy a sword. Having lost all credibility saying that, there are a plethora of alternatives to Glock that are also of high quality. While 1911’s are fantastic and are easy to get holsters, magazines, etc. for, I am not sure I would want to carry one. Steyr M series is a great alternative if you can live without the deep support structure. FN, Sig, Beretta, Ruger, Smith & Wesson, and the list can go on of quality options. I have seen John’s commentary on learning to have a good grip and stop complaining about a gun not fitting your hand. He knows more than me, unquestionably, but intuitively, a gun that feels good in the hand should be easier to get a really good grip on. I think a more pressing concern is: most IWB carry positions leave the barrel of the gun pointing at some pretty dangerous body parts when sitting down. For instance, at around 1:30 or 2:00 that barrel is pointed right into the thigh with 1:30 awfully close to that femoral.
Jeffrey _

You forgot 1 piece. Unless you can afford a whole lot of handguns, stick to getting 9mms. While I have a 22lr and a 380, my other 4 handguns are all 9mm. Each has a role, but eat the same food. Makes it easy to buy ammo in bulk since I do not have to spread my purchase across calibers.

J_

“Whatever vehicle you chose, you should have gone Toyota Camry.”

🙄

Mike W_

Who says you can’t be both? I have a wide selection of historical firearms, most of which could still find a role to play in the modern world, but also a selection of AR’s in different configurations. I chose S&W’s M&P series over Glock; the M2.0 is simply a better gun and I will die on that hill, coming from someone who can shoot nearly any handgun well including Glocks. I abandoned the AK platform as a primary fighting option because of the safety; all things being equal, two people of equal training meeting in surprise close-range contact, the AR user will kill the AK user before the AK user gets their safety off. It’s a hard pill to swallow for some, but modern AR reliability makes the AK a non-viable platform as a point of contact weapon.

Leave a Comment